George et al v. Sonoma County Sherrif's Department et al

Filing 228

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #227 Stipulation, filed by Tajmah Beauchamp, Valerie George, Donald George. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on November 30, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:08-cv-02675-EDL Document227 Filed11/24/09 Page1 of 2 Thomas Marc Litton (CA Bar # 119985) SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 421-4774 Facsimile: (415) 421-4784 Steven L. Wittels SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (646) 723-2947 Facsimile: (646) 723-2948 swittels@nydclaw.com Admitted Pro Hac Vice UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VALERIE GEORGE, as Administrator and Personal Representative of THE ESTATE OF RYAN GEORGE; VALERIE GEORGE and/or TAJMAH BEAUCHAMP, as Legal Representative(s) for Jaida George and Ryan George, Jr.; VALERIE GEORGE, Individually; DONALD GEORGE; and TAJMAH BEAUCHAMP, Individually, Plaintiffs, vs. SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; BILL COGBILL; COUNTY OF SONOMA; CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC; JAMES LUDERS, M.D.; MICHAEL E. DAGEY, R.N.; SUTTER HEALTH; SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER OF SANTA ROSA; EDWARD W. HARD, M.D.; RICHARD FLINDERS, M.D.; JOSEPH N. MATEL, M.D.; NORICK JANIAN, M.D.; ANGUS MATHESON, M.D., and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 3:08-cv-02675-EDL ECF Case STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO RESPOND SUTTER DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO THE PLAINTIFF ESTATE'S NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Case3:08-cv-02675-EDL Document227 Filed11/24/09 Page2 of 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned counsel for all parties, that subject to the Court's approval, the date for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants Sutter Health and Sutter Medical Center of Santa Rosa's motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the Plaintiff-Estate's Ninth Cause of Action shall be as follows: (i) Plaintiffs' response to the above-described Defendant's motion shall be due January 5, 2010. (ii) (iii) Defendants' reply in support of their motion shall be due January 12, 2010. The hearing date for the Sutter Defendants' motion shall be moved to January 26, 2010 at 9:00 AM. SO STIPULATED. DATED: November 24, 2009 SANFORD, WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs VALERIE GEORGE, TAJMAH BEAUCHAMP, and DONALD GEORGE By: /s/ Steven L. Wittels Steven L. Wittels, Esq. DATED: November 24, 2009 LAFOLLETTE, JOHNSON, DEHAAS, FESLER & AMES Attorneys for Defendant SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER OF SANTA ROSA By: /s/ Larry Byron Thornton Larry Byron Thornton, Esq. November 30, 2009 SO ORDERED:______________________________ U.S.D.M.J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?