George et al v. Sonoma County Sherrif's Department et al

Filing 279

STIPULATION & ORDER RE PAGE LIMIT AS MODIFIED re #277 . Signed by Mag. Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/19/2010. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

HASSARD BONNINGTON LLP MARC N. ZIMMERMAN, ESQ., State Bar No. 100521 R. WESLEY PRATT, ESQ., State Bar No. 191159 JOANNA L. STOREY, ESQ., State Bar No. 214952 Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800 San Francisco, California 94111-3941 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants JOSEPH R. MATEL, M.D. and RICHARD FLINDERS, M.D. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VALERIE GEORGE, et. al., Plaintiffs, vs. SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et. al., Defendants. No. C-08-02675 EDL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AS MODIFIED

Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte Third Amended Complaint Filed: February 24, 2009 Jury Trial Date: September 7, 2010 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants Joseph R. Matel, M.D. and Richard Flinders, M.D. intend to submit a motion for summary judgment, or alternatively, summary adjudication, against plaintiffs' Third Amended complaint. Plaintiffs allege nineteen causes of action against the defendants. Joseph R. Matel, M.D. and Richard Flinders, M.D. intend to move for motion for summary judgment, or alternatively, summary adjudication, as to most of the nine causes of action alleged against them. ///

-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
P:\Wdocs\HBMAIN\00045\00213\00462528.DOC-31610

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

In order to properly support the motion for motion for summary judgment, or alternatively, summary adjudication, on each cause of action against Joseph R. Matel, M.D. and Richard Flinders, M.D., defendants believe significantly more space is needed than the allowed 25 pages allowed pursuant to Local Rules 72(b) and 7-4(b). In light of the Court March 5, 2010 Order granting the ex parte application by Defendants Sutter Health and Sutter Medical Center of Santa Rosa to file a memorandum of points and authorities in support of their motion for summary judgment not exceeding 55 pages in length, plaintiffs do not oppose Joseph R. Matel, M.D. and Richard Flinders, M.D.'s request for a 55 page limit. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, that, subject to the Court's approval, defendants Joseph R. Matel, M.D. and Richard Flinders, M.D. be permitted to file a memorandum of points and authorities in support of their motion for summary adjudication not to exceed 55 pages in length. Dated: March 16, 2010 HASSARD BONNINGTON LLP /S/ ______________________________ Joanna L. Storey Attorneys for Defendants JOSEPH R. MATEL, M.D. and RICHARD FLINDERS, M.D. Dated: March 16, 2010 SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER LLP /S/ ______________________________ Steven Wittels Attorneys for Plaintiffs VALERIE GEORGE, DONALD GEORGE, JAIDA GEORGE, and RYAN GEORGE, JR.
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
P:\Wdocs\HBMAIN\00045\00213\00462528.DOC-31610

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
March 19, 2010 Dated: ______________

******** GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Joseph R. Matel, M.D. and Richard Flinders, M.D. be allowed to file a memorandum of points and authorities in support of their motion for summary
50

judgment, or alternatively, summary adjudication not exceeding 55 pages in length. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
P:\Wdocs\HBMAIN\00045\00213\00462528.DOC-31610

A

C

LI

FO

lizabet Judge E

h D. La

porte

R NIA

S DISTRICT TE _____________________________ C TA D. Laporte Elizabeth United States Magistrate Judge DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO

RT U O

UNIT ED
NO

S

RT

H