George et al v. Sonoma County Sherrif's Department et al

Filing 432

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE UNDER CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-9(D) re #427 MOTION for Leave to File MOTION for Reconsideration & re #424 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Dismissal of Wrongful Death and Other State Law Claims against County and Sheriff's Department MOTION for Reconsideration re #424 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Dismissal of Wrongful Death and Other State Law Claims against County and Sheriff's Department filed by Tajmah Beauchamp, Valerie George, Donald George. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on October 27, 2010. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2010)

Download PDF
George et al v. Sonoma County Sherrif's Department et al Doc. 432 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On October 21, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration of Order Dismissing Plaintiffs' Wrongful Death and Other State Law Claims Against the County and Sheriff's Department. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(d), "[u]nless otherwise ordered by the assigned Judge, no response need be filed and no hearing will be held concerning a motion for leave to file a motion to reconsider." However, the Court may order the filing of additional papers. See Civ. L.R. 7-9(d). Accordingly, no later than November10, 2010, the County Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 27, 2010 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge v. SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., et al., Defendants. / VALERIE GEORGE, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C-08-02675 EDL ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE UNDER CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-9(d) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?