George et al v. Sonoma County Sherrif's Department et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #47 Stipulation filed by Sutter Medical Center of Santa Rosa, Sutter Health. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on October 8, 2008. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BARRY VOGEL, STATE BAR NO. 108640 LARRY THORNTON, STATE BAR NO. 232265 LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON, DE HAAS, FESLER & AMES 655 University Avenue, Suite 119 Sacramento, California 95825 Phone: (916) 563-3100 Facsimile: (916) 565-3704 E-mail: lthornton@ljdfa.com Attorneys for Defendant, SUTTER HEALTH and SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER OF SANTA ROSA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VALERIE GEORGE, as Administrator and) Personal Representative of THE ESTATE) OF RYAN GEORGE; VALERIE GEORGE) and TAJMAH BEAUCHAMP, as Legal) Representatives for Jaida George and Ryan) G e o r g e , Jr.; VALERIE GEORGE,) Individually; DONALD GEORGE; and) TAJMAH BEAUCHAMP, Individually, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) S O N O M A COUNTY SHERIFF'S) D E P A R T M E N T ; BILL COGBILL;) COUNTY OF SONOMA; CALIFORNIA) FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC;) JAMES LUDERS, M.D.; MICHAEL E.) DAGEY, R.N.; SUTTER HEALTH;) SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER OF SANTA) ROSA; EDWARD W. HARD, M.D.;) RICHARD FLINDERS, M.D.; JOSEPH N.) MATEL, M.D.; NORICK JANIAN, M.D.;) ) and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, ) ) Def e ndants. __________________________________ ) /// /// CASE NO.: 3:08-cv-02675-EDL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME TO FILE AN ADR CERTIFICATION AND TO SELECT AN ADR PROCESS 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADR DEADLINES 3:08-cv-02675-EDL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, THE PARTIES THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD AGREE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS: 1. 2. Counsel have met and conferred regarding selection of an ADR process. The Amended Complaint names as additional defendants Edward W. Hard, M.D., Richard Flinders, M.D., Joseph N. Matel, M.D. and Norick Janian, M.D. 3. It is premature to select an ADR process in the absence of these additional def e ndants. 4. The initial case management conference has been continued to December 16, 2008. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: That the filing and service of the ADR Certification and either a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting an ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference will be due no later than November 26, 2008. Dated: October 7, 2008 LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON, DE HAAS, FESLER & AMES By:___________/s/___________________________ LARRY THORNTON, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants SUTTER HEALTH and SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER OF SANTA ROSA Dated: October 7, 2008 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// TRIMBLE, SHERINIAN & VARANINI By:____________/s/__________________________ JEROME M. VARANINI, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC., JAMES LUDERS, M.D. and MICHAEL DAGEY, R.N. 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADR DEADLINES 3:08-cv-02675-EDL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Dated: October 7, 2008 SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL, LLP By:___________/s/_____________________ TERRY S. STERLING, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BILL COGBILL and COUNTY OF SONOMA Dated: October 7, 2008 SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP By:___________/s/___________________________ STEVEN WITTELS, ESQ. Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS PROPOSED ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the filing and service of the ADR Certification and either a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting an ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference will be due no later than November 26, 2008. ISTRIC ES D TC AT T October 8 Dated: ____________, 2008 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ER N F D IS T IC T O R 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADR DEADLINES A C LI FO liza Judge E beth D. Laporte 3:08-cv-02675-EDL R NIA __________________ERED ________________ ____ The Honorable SO ORD IS ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE IT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE NO UNIT ED 20 RT U O S RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?