Wesley v. Gates

Filing 205

ORDER vacating 203 prior dismissal order. Case to remain terminated but under continued jurisdiction (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page1 of 13 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page2 of 13 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page3 of 13 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page4 of 13 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page5 of 13 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page6 of 13 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page7 of 13 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page8 of 13 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page9 of 13 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page10 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: // // // Attorney for Defendant PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT, APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: The prior Order of Dismiss (doc. 203) is vacated. _______________________ The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT FOR COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT Wesley v. Gates, No. C-08-2719 SI Page 10 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page11 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT FOR COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT Wesley v. Gates, No. C-08-2719 SI EXHIBIT A Page 11 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page12 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARY DRYOVAGE, (CA SBN 112551) Law Offices of Mary Dryovage 600 Harrison Street, Suite 120, San Francisco, CA 94107 Telephone: 415 593-0095 Fax. 415 593-0096 Email: mdryovage@igc.org WENDY MUSELL (CA SBN 203507) Stewart & Musell 600 Harrison Street, Suite 120 San Francisco, CA 94107 Telephone: 415/593-0083 Fax: 415/520-0920 Email: wmusell@stewartandmusell.com Attorneys for Plaintiff HILTON I. WESLEY JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (SBN 44332) United States Attorney VICTORIA CARRADERO (SBN 217885) Assistant United States Attorney MICHAEL PYLE (SBN 1721854) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, CA 94102-3495 Telephone: 415 436-7181 Fax: 415 436-6748 Email: Victoria.Carradero@usdoj.gov Email: Michael.T.Pyle@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION HILTON I. WESLEY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT M. GATES, SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY, Defendant. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with S T IP U L A T IO N O F D IS M IS S A L W e s l e y v . G a te s , N o . C -0 8 -2 7 1 9 S I ( M E J ) Case No. C09-2719-SI (MEJ) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL P age 1 Case3:08-cv-02719-SI Document204-1 Filed10/19/09 Page13 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 prejudice. Each party is to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, LAW OFFICES OF MARY DRYOVAGE Dated: ______________________________ MARY DRYOVAGE Attorney for Plaintiff STEWART & MUSELL Dated: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 action with prejudice, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S T IP U L A T IO N O F D IS M IS S A L W e s l e y v . G a te s , N o . C -0 8 -2 7 1 9 S I ( M E J ) ______________________________ WENDY MUSELL Attorney for Plaintiff JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney Dated: ______________________________ VICTORIA CARRADERO Attorney for Defendant Dated: ______________________________ MICHAEL T. PYLE Attorney for Defendant ORDER The Court, having been informed that the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _______________ ______________________________ THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Court P age 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?