Jankey et al v. Five Happiness Restaurant Inc et al

Filing 10

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause, in writing and no later than November 14, 2008, why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecut e. In the event plaintiffs file a Notice of Need for Mediation on or before November 14, 2008, this Order to Show Cause will stand discharged without further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 31, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 31, 2008 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge United States District Court v. FIVE HAPPINESS RESTAURANT, INC., et al., Defendants. / By order filed May 30, 2008, the parties and counsel were directed to conduct a joint inspection of the premises at issue herein and to do so no later than September 8, 2008. (See Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial Of Right to Access Under Americans With Disabilities Act Title III.) Further, plaintiffs were ordered to file, no later than 45 days after the joint site inspection, a Notice of Need for Mediation. (See id.) To date, plaintiffs have not filed a Notice of Need for Mediation. Accordingly, plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later than November 14, 2008, why the above-titled action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In the event plaintiffs file a Notice of Need for Mediation on or before November 14, 2008, this Order to Show Cause will stand discharged without further order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. LES JANKEY, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C-08-2733 MMC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA