Legal Additions LLC v. Kowalski et al
Filing
143
ORDER granting 140 Plaintiff's motion for leave to file motion for reconsideration. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/28/2010. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. JEROME KOWALKSI, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ LEGAL ADDITIONS LLC, Plaintiff, No. C-08-2754 EMC ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Docket No. 140) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiff Legal Additions LLC has asked for leave to file a motion for reconsideration. Having considered Legal Additions's brief and accompanying submissions, the Court hereby GRANTS Legal Additions leave to file the motion to reconsider. The Court is satisfied that Legal Additions has made an adequate showing under Civil Local Rule 7-9(b) to justify the filing of a motion to reconsider. Moreover, because the issue of the economic loss rule, particularly as applied to Mr. Kowalski as an individual, was not an issue raised in Defendants' motion or fully briefed thereafter, the Court concludes that, in the interest of due process, it shall allow the filing of the motion to reconsider. /// /// /// /// /// ///
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
The Court hereby deems Legal Additions's motion for leave to file, located at Docket No. 140, its substantive motion to reconsider. Defendants are ordered to file an opposition to the motion by May 7, 2010. Any reply shall be filed by May 11, 2010. If, after reviewing the briefs, the Court deems a hearing on the motion necessary, it shall so notify the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 28, 2010 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?