Gurung v. Mueller et al

Filing 11

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE; Each side to bear costs; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 12/16/2008. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2008)

Download PDF
1 J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332 United States Attorney 2 J OANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Chief, Civil Division 3 EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150 Assistant United States Attorney 4 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 5 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-6915 6 FAX: (415) 436-6927 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 BISHNU KUMARI GURUNG, 12 Plaintiff , 13 v. 14 ROBERT MUELLER, III, Director, Federal 15 Bureau of Investigation; et al., 16 17 The plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and defendants, by and through their 18 attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to dismiss the above-entitled 19 action because the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has acted on the 20 plaintiff's application for asylum and referred it to an immigration judge for adjudication in 21 removal proceedings. 22 Each of the parties shall bear their own costs and fees. 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 STIPULATION TO DISMISS C 08-2817 MHP 1 D ef en d a n t s . ) No. C 08-2817 MHP ) ) ) STIPULATION TO DISMISS; AND ) [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) ) ) ) 1 DATED: December 11, 2008 2 3 4 5 6 7 DATED: December 11, 2008 8 9 10 11 Respectfully submitted, J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ EDWARD A. OLSEN Assistant United States Attorney /s/ BEN LOVEMAN Law Offices of Virender Kumar Goswami Attorney for Plaintiff O RD ER 12 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO DISMISS C 08-2817 MHP 2 Dated: 12/16/2008 UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N D IS T IC T R OF A C LI FO arilyn Judge M l H. Pate R NIA MARILYN HALL PATEL United States District Judge O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?