Edwards v. Sisto

Filing 20

USCA ORDER - Petition for Mandamus is denied. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2009)

Case: 09-70086

02/25/2009

Page: 1 of 1

DktEntry: 6820217

U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

F IL E D
FEB 25 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S

In re: JAMES EUGENE EDWARDS; D A V ID E. EDWARDS.

N o . 09-70086 D .C . Nos. 3:08-cv-02842-WHA 3:08-cv-02841-WHA N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco

JA M E S EUGENE EDWARDS; et al., Petitioners, v. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF C A L IF O R N IA , Respondent, D .K . SISTO, Warden, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER

B efo re: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges. P etitio n er has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of th is court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U n ited States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. A ll pending motions are denied as moot. N o motions for reconsideration, modification, or clarification of this order sh all be filed or entertained.
HS/MOATT