Alarid v. Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District et al

Filing 31

AMENDED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S DISCOVERY DISPUTE [May 18, 2009, at 3:30 p.m.] [re 27 Order]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 5/12/2009. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DOUGLAS ALARID, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, MICHAEL LOCATI, DAVID RIVERA, KAY WITT, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. / AMENDED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S DISCOVERY DISPUTE No. C 08-02845 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court hereby CONTINUES the hearing on defendant's discovery dispute to MONDAY, MAY 18, 2009, AT 3:30 P.M. This continuance is requested by plaintiff due to two of his lawyers being in trial and a third taken ill on Monday. Plaintiff's counsel is again ORDERED to make sure plaintiff's spouse, Amy Alarid, appears at the hearing. The hearing noticed for May 12, 2009, is VACATED. Please note there will be no further continuances. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 13, 2009. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?