Alarid v. Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District et al

Filing 71

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 28, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2009)

Case3:08-cv-02845-WHA Document70

Filed10/27/09 Page1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP DIANE MARIE O'MALLEY - 139166 [e-mail] JAHMAL T. DAVIS - 191504 [e-mail] 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT KAHN BROWN & POORE LLP DAVID M. POORE, ESQ. [e-mail] 30 Fifth Street, Second Floor Petaluma, California 94952 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorney for Plaintiff DOUGLAS ALARID UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (San Francisco)

DOUGLAS ALARID, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT; MICHAEL LOCATI; DAVID RIVERA; KAY WITT, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

No. CV-08-02845-WHA STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the entire above-captioned action, against all named defendants be and -1STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (CASE NO. CV-08-02845-WHA)

Case3:08-cv-02845-WHA Document70

Filed10/27/09 Page2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41 (a) (1)(A). Each party is to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

Dated: October 27, 2009

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP By: ___/s/ Jahmal T. Davis____________ JAHMAL T. DAVIS Attorney for Defendants

Dated: October 27, 2009

KAHN BROWN & POORE LLP By: /s/ David M. Poore David M. Poore Attorney for Plaintiff ________

-2STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (CASE NO. CV-08-02845-WHA)

Case3:08-cv-02845-WHA Document70

Filed10/27/09 Page3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: October 28, 2009 _______________________ IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER

The above-captioned action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41 (a) (1)(A).
UNIT ED
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

RT U O

S

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-3STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (CASE NO. CV-08-02845-WHA)

A

C

LI

FO

Judge W

ls illiam A

u

R NIA

__________________________________ HON. WILLIAM ALSUP p
NO

O ORD IT IS S

ERED

RT

H