Aeroscout, Inc. v. Savi Technology, Inc.

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER ADJUSTING PATENT LOCAL RULE DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 12, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW M O U N T A I N VI E W

SUBMITTING COUNSEL ON SIGNATURE PAGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

AEROSCOUT, INC., Plaintiff, vs. SAVI TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. SAVI TECHNOLOGY, INC., Counterclaimant, vs. AEROSCOUT, INC., Counterclaim Defendant.

Case No. C 08-02919 (WHA) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ADJUSTING PATENT LOCAL RULE DEADLINES The Honorable William H. Alsup

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

STIPULATION Plaintiff and counterclaim defendant AeroScout, Inc. ("AeroScout") and defendant and counterclaimant Savi Technology, Inc. ("Savi") stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, to adjust certain claim construction-related deadlines (but no hearing or appearance dates) set by the Patent Local Rules and by the Court.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ADJUSTING PATENT LOCAL RULE DEADLINES CASE NO. C 08-02919 (WHA)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW M O U N T A I N VI E W

The following modest modification to the current schedule is proposed and requested in order to allow the parties additional time to produce and review disclosure documents. The only filing date modification proposed is moving the date for the joint claim construction and prehearing statement, currently set for January 23rd, to January 26th. No hearing or other filing dates are affected. The stipulated and proposed schedule is as follows: Date 01/20/09 01/26/09 02/09/09 02/27/09 03/06/09 Event Parties exchange preliminary constructions and supporting references (Pat. L.R. 4-2) Parties file joint claim construction and pre-hearing statement (Pat. L.R. 4-3) Savi files opening claim construction brief* AeroScout files responsive claim construction brief* Savi files reply claim construction brief*
*These dates were previously set by the Court and the parties do not propose to change them.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: January 9, 2009

By: /s/ David S. Elkins_____________ David S. Elkins (CSB No. 148077) [e-mail] Wayne A. Jones (CSB No. 255362) [e-mail] Xavier M. Brandwajn (CSB No. 246218) [e-mail] SQUIRE SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLP 600 Hansen Way Palo Alto, CA 94304-1043 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant AEROSCOUT, INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ADJUSTING PATENT LOCAL RULE DEADLINES

2

CASE NO. C 08-02919 (WHA)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW M O U N T A I N VI E W

Dated: January 9, 2009

By: /s/ David D. Schumann___________ Lynn H. Pasahow (CSB No. 054283) [e-mail] Virginia K. DeMarchi (CSB No. 168633) [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] David D. Schumann (CSB No. 223936) [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant-Counterclaimant SAVI TECHNOLOGY, INC.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, David D. Schumann, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January 9, 2009. By:/s/ David D. Schumann____________ David D. Schumann
S DISTRICT TE C TA

ORDER
UNIT ED

RT U O

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: January ___, 2009

S

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ADJUSTING PATENT LOCAL RULE DEADLINES

3

CASE NO. C 08-02919 (WHA)

A

C

LI

FO

WILLIAM H. ALSUP up liam Als UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE dge Wil Ju
NO

R NIA

O IT IS S

ORDER

ED

RT

H