Lloyd v. Joshi et al

Filing 96

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING 93 CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL ORDER to and including 5/11/2010; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/26/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Wayne Johnson, SBN: 112588 Law Offices of Wayne Johnson P.O. Box 19157 Oakland, CA 94619 (510) 451-1166 Attorney for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ELTON LLOYD, PLAINTIFF, v. H. JOSHI, ET. AL. DEFENDANTS. __________________________________________/ CIVIL NO: NO: C 08-2942 MHP STIPULATION TO EXTEND 90 DAY CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL AND ORDER 1. Good cause appearing therefor, the parties hereby stipulate that the period to notify the court of the failure of consideration as stated in the Conditional Dismissal entered by the court on December 11, 2009, is hereby extended so that the date for notifying the court of the failure of consideration is extended up to and including May 11, 2010. It is so stipulated. DATED: January 23, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF WAYNE JOHNSON S/ ____________________________ WAYNE JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff \\\ \\\ \\\ STIPULATION TO EXTEND PERIOD FOR NOTIFYING COURT RE COND. DISM. -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: January 25, 2010 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ______/S/_________________________ ARLENE M. ROSEN Senior Deputy City Attorney for Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND, et al. _____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER Good cause appearing therefor. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ________________________ 1/26/2010 UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R STIPULATION TO EXTEND PERIOD FOR NOTIFYING COURT RE COND. DISM. A C LI -2 FO ______________________________________ l H. Pate UNITED STATESrDISTRICT COURT JUDGE Ma ilyn Judge R NIA OO IT IS S RDERE D RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?