BrowserCam, Inc. v. Gomez, Inc.
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT GOMEZ, INC. TO FILE AND SERVE AN ANSWER (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2008)
Case 3:08-cv-02959-WHA
Document 35
Filed 10/09/2008
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP Jonathan A. Shapiro (SBN: 257199) jonathan.shapiro@wilmerhale.com Michael A. Mugmon (SBN: 251958) michael.mugmon@wilmerhale.com 1117 S. California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel. (650) 858-6000 Fax. (650) 858-6100 Attorneys for Defendant GOMEZ, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION BROWSERCAM, INC., Plaintiff, vs. GOMEZ, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 08-2959-WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT GOMEZ, INC. TO FILE AND SERVE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
10 11
1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2008;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff BrowserCam's Complaint was filed Friday, June 13, 2008, and Defendant Gomez, Inc. ("Gomez") was served with the Complaint on Tuesday, June 17, 2008; WHEREAS, Gomez filed a motion to dismiss or transfer the action on Tuesday, July 22,
WHEREAS, the Court denied Gomez's motion to dismiss or transfer on Friday, September 26, 2008; WHEREAS, Gomez's Answer is currently due on Friday, October 10, 2008; WHEREAS, Gomez has requested, and counsel for Plaintiff has agreed to, a one-week extension up to and including Friday, October 17, 2008, for Gomez to file its Answer;
Case No. C 08-2959-WHA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT GOMEZ, INC. TO FILE AND SERVE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
Case 3:08-cv-02959-WHA
Document 35
Filed 10/09/2008
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate that Gomez may file and serve its Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint up to and including Friday, October 17, 2008. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, DATED: October 9, 2008 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP /S/ Jonathan A. Shapiro Jonathan A. Shapiro Attorney for Defendant GOMEZ, INC. DATED: October 9, 2008 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS
10 11
1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C 08-2959-WHA
/S/ Stephen S. Walters (with permission) Stephen S. Walters Three Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4074 Tel: (415) 837-1515 Fax: (415) 837-1516 swalters@allenmatkins.com Attorney for Plaintiff BROWSERCAM, INC. SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 9th day of October, 2008, at Palo Alto, California. /S/ Jonathan A. Shapiro Jonathan A. Shapiro, Esq.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT GOMEZ, INC. TO FILE AND SERVE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
Case 3:08-cv-02959-WHA
Document 35
Filed 10/09/2008
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
[PROPOSED] ORDER The Court hereby GRANTS the Parties' stipulated request to extend the deadline up to and including Friday, October 17, 2008 for Gomez to file and serve its AnswerRto Plaintiff's Complaint. IST
UNIT ED
SD TE TA ORDERED.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO
ICT C
RT U O
S
10 11
1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C 08-2959-WHA
US1DOCS 6846127v1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT GOMEZ, INC. TO FILE AND SERVE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
A
October 10, 2008 DATED: ____________________________
___________________________________ ER C William H. Alsup N F D IS T IC T O R Court Judge United States District
LI
FO
Judge W
illiam A
lsup
R NIA
IT IS S
O ORD
ERED
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?