BrowserCam, Inc. v. Gomez, Inc.
Filing
55
ORDER REFERRING ALL DISCOVERY DISPUTES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE [re 49 Letter filed by BrowserCam, Inc.]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 12/24/2008. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/24/2008)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BROWSERCAM , INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. GOMEZ, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
No. C 08-02959 WHA
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER REFERRING ALL DISCOVERY DISPUTES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court had previously been informed by counsel that the discovery dispute had been resolved. Now, however, it has apparently come back to life. The problem now is that the judge is beginning a siege of trials and no longer has the time for resolving discovery disputes in the foreseeable future. Therefore, all discovery disputes in this case, including the current one, are hereby REFERRED to a magistrate judge to be selected. All deadlines in the case management order remain in place.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 24, 2008.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
