BrowserCam, Inc. v. Gomez, Inc.
Filing
73
ORDER RE ARBITRATION. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 3, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BROWSERCAM, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. GOMEZ, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. / No. C 08-02959 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER RE ARBITRATION
JAMS is not an accounting firm. The contract requires a "reasonably agreeable independent accounting firm." The parties must start the selection process completely over. The parties must limit themselves to independent accounting firms. Neither plaintiff nor defendant, however, should be able to choose an accounting firm that it previously worked with, unless the other party finds such accounting firm reasonably agreeable. WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
OF THE DATE HEREOF,
the parties must select an independent accounting firm and notify the
Court that the independent accounting firm is on board. Status reports to this Court on the progress of the arbitration will be required every twelve weeks, starting twelve weeks from the date hereof. The parties must jointly notify the Court of the completion of arbitration within seven days of completion. The parties must complete arbitration by DECEMBER 3, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 3, 2009
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?