Starrett v. Zide et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, CLOSING FILE. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/24/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On June 16, 2008, Plaintiff Bernice Starrett filed the above-captioned matter alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692. Subsequently, but prior to Defendants making an appearance in this case, the parties reached a settlement. (Dkt. #9.) At Plaintiff's request, the Court continued the Case Management Conference to allow the parties time to complete the settlement. However, Plaintiff's most recent status report indicates that Defendants have not performed according to the terms of the agreement. It appears that this case has become a breach of contract dispute that is more properly heard in state court. "An agreement to settle a legal dispute is a contract and its enforceability is governed by familiar principles of contract law." Jeff D. v. Andrus, 899 F.2d 753, 759 (9th Cir. 1989). "Each party agrees to 'extinguish those legal rights it sought to enforce through litigation in exchange for those rights secured by the contract.'" Id. (quoting Village of Kaktovik v. Watt, 689 F.2d 222, 230 (D.C. Cir. 1982). Thus, the Court finds that the parties' agreement extinguished the legal rights FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BERNICE M. STARRETT, Plaintiff(s), vs. FLINT C. ZIDE, et al., Defendant(s). / No. C 08-2974 MEJ ORDER DISMISSING CASE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiff sought to enforce in her complaint, and the proper remedy is to bring a breach of contract claim in state court. O'Connor v. Colvin, 70 F.3d 530, 532 (9th Cir. 1995) ("federal courts do not have inherent or ancillary jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement simply because the subject of that settlement was a federal lawsuit.") Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISS Plaintiff's complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a breach of contract claim in state court. The Clerk of Court shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 24, 2009
MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Bernice M. Starrett P.O. Box 1359 Chico, CA 95927 Dated: February 24, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BERNICE M. STARRETT, Plaintiff, v. FLINT C. ZIDE et al, Defendant. /
Case Number: CV08-02974 MEJ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on February 24, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?