Kairy et al v. Supershuttle International et al

Filing 132

ORDER GRANTING 131 Stipulation re Anticipated Motions. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on July 2, 2009. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:08-cv-02993-JSW Document131 Filed07/02/09 Page1 of 4 2 3 4 Paul Marron, Esq., State Bar No. 128245 Steven C. Rice, Esq., State Bar No. 109659 Andre Y. Bates, Esq., State Bar No. 178170 MARRON & ASSOCIATES 320 Golden Shore, Suite 410 Long Beach, CA 90802 Tel.: 562.432.7422 Fax: 562.432.8682 5 6 7 8 9 E-mail: pmarron@marronlaw.com E-mail: abates@niarronlaw.com Robert Jon Hendricks, Esq., State Bar No. 179751 Albert Huang, Esq., State Bar No. 193005 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 300 South Grand Avenue, Twenty-Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132 10 II Tel.: 213.612.2500 Fax: 213.612.2501 E-mail: rhendricks@morganlewis.com E-mail: aluKing@morganlewis.coni Attorneys for Defendants SUPERSHUTTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC.; SUPERSHUTTLE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 FRANCHISE CORPORATION, Additional Counsel Listed on Next Page UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT 20 ROOSEVELT KAIRY, LARRY BROWN, WAYNE DICKSON, DRAKE OSMUN, AND Case No.: 08-CV-02993-JSW(BZ) JOINT PROPOSAL RE ANTICIPATED MOTIONS 21 22 HARJINDER SINGHDIETZ On Behalf of Themselves, All Other Similarly Situated, 23 24 And The General Public, Plaintiffs, vs. AND ORDER THEREON 25 26 27 28 SUPERSHUTTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC.; SUPERSHUTTLE FRANCHISE CORPORATION, and DOES I through 20, inclusive, Defendants. l Case No. 08-CV-02993-JSW(BZ) JOINT PROPOSAL RE ANTICIPATED MOTIONS - July 2, 2009 Case3:08-cv-02993-JSW Document131 Filed07/02/09 Page2 of 4 Additional Counsel for Defendants Rebecca Eisen, Esq., State Bar No. 96129 Ann Marie Reding, Esq., State Bar No. 226864 MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Tower San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 442-1000 Facsimile: (415) 442-1001 reisen@morganlewis.com arcding@morganlevvis.com 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 08-CV-02993-JSVV(BZ) JOINT PROPOSAL RE ANTICIPATED MOTIONS - July 2, 2009 Case3:08-cv-02993-JSW Document131 Filed07/02/09 Page3 of 4 1 Pursuant to the Court's instructions at the June 26, 2009 Case Management Conference, 2 the panics submit the following proposed schedule for briefing and hearing upcoming motions and suggested page limitations for each motion. The parties also propose that a further Case Management Conference be scheduled along with each motion hearing date set forth below, to allow the Court and parties to revisit and modify as necessary the motion schedule and related issues in response to case developments. 7 8 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (FRCP Rule 12) and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Join Required Parties (FRCP Rule 19) A. Motions to be filed: August 17,2009 Briefs on each motion not to exceed 25 pages 11 12 13 14 15 B. Oppositions to be filed: September 4,2009 Briefs on each motion not to exceed 25 pages C. Replies to be filed: September 11,2009 Briefs on each motion not to exceed 15 pages D. Hearing date: September 25,2009 16 7 18 2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Certification of Class (FRCP Rule 23) A. B. Motion to be filed: Brief not to exceed 40 pages October 16,2009 November 25,2009 19 Opposition to be filed: Brief not to exceed 40 pages C. 22 Reply to be filed: Brief not to exceed 20 pages December 23,2009 D. Hearing date: January 8,2010 January 15, 2010 23 24 25 I -, 26 II 3. Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment and/or Partial Summary Judgment A. B. Defendants' Motion to be filed: Plaintiffs' Motion to be filed and May 7,2010 Plaintiffs' Opposition to be filed: June 4,2010 C. Defendants' Opposition to be filed and Defendants' Reply to be filed: 3 July 2, 2010 Case No. 08-CV-02993-JSW(BZ) JOINT PROPOSAL RE ANTICIPATED MOTIONS - July 2, 2009 Case3:08-cv-02993-JSW Document131 Filed07/02/09 Page4 of 4 D. E. Plaintiffs' Reply to be filed: Hearing date: July 16,2010 August 6,2QI0 The parties anticipate requesting an expansion on page limits for these cross-motions. However, as the scope of the motions will depend upon this Court's earlier rulings, the parties are not yet in a position to give an infonncd estimate of the number of pages necessary to adequately address the issues. 4. Other Motions The parties expect that other motions will be filed, including a motion for decertification of 10 the FLSA collective action; however, the details of such motions are not sufficiently known to include them in a schedule at this time. 12 13 14 Dated: July 2,2009 H1NTON, ALFERT & SUMNER 15 16 17 18 19 By:J: DAVID POGREL Attorneys for Plaintiffs 20 21 UNIT ED S ISTRIC ES D TC AT T MARRON & ASSOCIATES R NIA ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO Judge Je W ffrey S. hite RT U O Attorneys for Defendants 23 24 25 26 27 ER N F D IS T IC T O R 28 A C LI Case No. 08-CV-02993-JSW(BZ) JOINT PROPOSAL RE ANTICIPATED MOTIONS - July 2, 2009 FO NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?