Kairy et al v. Supershuttle International et al
Filing
357
ORDER Requiring Additional Briefing and Vacating Hearing. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on July 25, 2012. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ROOSEVELT KAIRY, ET AL.,
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiffs,
No. C 08-02993 JSW
v.
SUPERSHUTTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
ET AL.,
ORDER REQUIRING
ADDITIONAL BRIEFING AND
VACATING HEARING
12
Defendants.
13
/
14
In light of the arguments raised in the parties’ papers on the pending motions to compel
15
arbitration, the Court finds that further briefing is appropriate. Therefore, the Court HEREBY
16
VACATES the hearing on all pending motions currently scheduled for July 27, 2012 and
17
ORDERS Defendants to file a supplemental brief not to exceed 10 pages by no later than July
18
31, 2012 addressing the following questions:
19
20
21
(1) Why would moving for arbitration prior to the issuance of AT&T Mobility LLC v.
Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011), have been futile?
22
(2) What law – Delaware or California – would have applied to the determination of
unconscionability? Defendants merely drop a conclusory footnote (Reply at 2
n.4) without analysis.
23
Plaintiffs may file a response not to exceed 10 by no later than August 3, 2012. After
24
the supplemental briefing is received, the Court will either reschedule a hearing on the pending
25
motions if it appears necessary or will decide the motions as submitted.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 25, 2012
27
28
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?