Banga v. Cal State 9 Credit Union et al

Filing 180

ORDER RE: MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED. The following cases are not related: C 08-3015MMC - Banga v. Equifax Information Services LLC, et al., and C 09-4087JSW - Banga v. Equifax Information Services LLC. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 3, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2009)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RELATED CASE ORDER An Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related has been filed,1 stating that the following cases are related within the meaning of Civil L.R. 3-12(a): C 08-3015 MMC C 09-4087 JSW Banga v. Equifax Information Services LLC, et al. Banga v. Equifax Information Services LLC ORDER On the basis of the material submitted to the Court, as the Judge assigned to the earliest filed case, I find that the cases: [ X ] ARE NOT RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a). [ ] ARE RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a). DATED: November 3, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC noticed the motion for hearing on November 6, 2009. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11(c), however, such motion is "deemed submitted for immediate determination without hearing on the day after the opposition is due." Accordingly, the November 6, 2009 hearing is hereby VACATED. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?