Vintage Racing Motors, Inc. v. Daimler AG et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER: Further Case Management Conference continued to 1/3/2011 03:00 PM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco before the Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 9/8/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2010)

Download PDF
Vintage Racing Motors, Inc. v. Daimler AG et al Doc. 43 1 2 3 4 5 CROWELL & MORING LLP Gregory D. Call (CSB No. 120483, gcall@crowell.com) Loni A. Mahanta (CSB No. 253885, lmahanta@crowell.com) Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-2800 Facsimile: (415) 986-2827 Attorneys for Plaintiff Vintage Racing Motors, Inc. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CROWELL & MORING L L P ATTO RNEY S AT LAW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VINTAGE RACING MOTORS, INC., a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, v. DAIMLER AG, a German corporation, MERCEDES-BENZ MUSEUM GMBH, a German corporation, AND MERCEDESBENZ CLASSIC CENTER, a German corporation, Defendants. Case No. 3:08-cv-03025-MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff Vintage Racing Motors, Inc. ("VRM") and Specially Appearing Defendants Daimler AG and Mercedes-Benz Museum GmbH (collectively, "Daimler") (collectively, the "Parties") hereby file this stipulation: WHEREAS, Judge Marilyn H. Patel set the Further Case Management Conference for September 13, 2010; WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed upon the vast majority of the settlement terms and are working to resolve a few final points; WHEREAS, a compelling reason to continue the Case Management Conference to December 13, 2010 exists because the Parties anticipate that the settlement will be finalized shortly, either through informal settlement discussions or through mediation; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; CASE NO. 3:08-CV-03025-MHP Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /// 27 28 CROWELL & MORING L L P ATTO RNEY S AT LAW WHEREAS, the Parties' chosen mediator already has a full fall schedule; WHEREAS, the mediation will involve coordination of German and U.S. nationals; WHEREAS, the Parties believe that mediation, if necessary, will be completed by December 13, 2010, WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that December 13, 2010 is a mutually convenient time on which to hold the Case Management Conference; and WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the continuation will not unreasonably prolong the litigation, but rather will further the aims of judicial economy by facilitating settlement of the case. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties through undersigned counsel that they request the Court to continue the Case Management Conference from September 13, 2010 to December 13, 2010, or as the Court's calendar permits. Dated: September 7, 2010 CROWELL & MORING LLP /s/ Loni A. Mahanta Loni A. Mahanta Attorneys for Plaintiff Vintage Racing Motors, Inc. Dated: September 7, 2010 CAROLL, BURDICK & MCDONOUGH LLP /s/ Matthew F. Miller Matthew F. Miller Attorneys for Defendants Daimler AG and Mercedes-Benz Museum GmbH /// /// /// -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; CASE NO. 3:08-CV-03025-MHP 1 2 3 4 Order On consideration of the foregoing, good cause being shown, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Case Management Conference shall be continued from September 13, 2010 to December 13, 2010. January 3, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. NO FURTHER 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CROWELL & MORING L L P ATTO RNEY S AT LAW CONTINUANCES. Dated: ____________ 9/8/2010 ICT S ________________________________ TE UNIT ED Judge Marilyn Hall Patel S TA DISTR C 163048\0004001\902144868.1 ER N D IS T IC T R OF -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; CASE NO. 3:08-CV-03025-MHP A C LI FO arilyn Judge M l H. Pate R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?