Mayer et al v. County of Alameda et al
Filing
24
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Having advised the court that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action be dismissed with prejudice, provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this cou rt, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker on 5/14/2009. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTY R. BUCKHOUT, ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTY J. WHITE, et al., Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GARY MAYER, JEANETTE MAYER and CINDY COELHO, Plaintiff,
No. C 08-3117
VRW
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Having advised the court that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action be dismissed with prejudice, provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Dated: May 14, 2009
VAUGHN R WALKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?