Vnus Medical Technologies Inc. v. Biolitec, Inc. et al

Filing 99

ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING. The Court informs the parties the Court will construe no more than ten terms in connection with the claim construction hearing, i.e., the terms identified by the parties as the "most significant" pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-3(c). Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 23, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 23, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge v. BIOLITEC, INC., et al., Defendants / United States District Court VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, No. C-08-3129 MMC ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On August 17, 2009, the Court will conduct a claim construction hearing in the above-titled action. Under the Local Rules of Practice for Patent Case, the parties, in their Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, are, inter alia, required to identify "the terms whose construction will be most significant to the resolution of the case up to a maximum of 10." See Patent L.R. 4-3(c). The Court hereby informs the parties the Court will construe no more than ten terms in connection with the claim construction hearing, i.e., the terms identified by the parties as the "most significant" pursuant to Patent Local Rule 43(c). IT IS SO ORDERED.