Wright v. Chiang et al

Filing 14

ORDER RE BRIEFING FOR MOTION TO DISMISS (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2008) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2008: # 1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ERNEST WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. JOHN CHIANG, STATE CONTROLLER, JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD, CHIEF DIVISION OF AUDITS, MATTHEW MIRANDA, FIELD AUDITOR, AND DOES 1­XX, Defendants. / ORDER RE BRIEFING FOR MOTION TO DISMISS No. C 08-03134 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, acting pro se, filed a complaint for civil rights and employment-law violations on June 30, 2008. On October 6, 2008, defendants filed a motion to dismiss and for a more definite statement. Defendants noticed a hearing on the motion for November 13, 2008. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, therefore, plaintiff's opposition to the motion was due October 23, 2008. Plaintiff has filed no opposition to the motion. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to respond to defendants' motion by THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2008. Plaintiff shall either (1) file his opposition brief by that date, or (2) file a request for more time setting forth the reasons for the late filing and good cause for a continuance of the briefing and hearing schedule. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 If plaintiff submits an opposition brief by October 30, defendant shall have until NOVEMBER 6, 2008, to file its reply brief and the hearing will proceed on November 13 as scheduled. If plaintiff fails to respond by October 30 either by filing an opposition brief or by showing good cause for a continuance, as described above, the Court must deem defendants' motion to dismiss unopposed and will grant the motion on that basis. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 28, 2008 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?