Wright v. Chiang et al

Filing 24

ORDER RE BRIEFING FOR MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/6/2009: # 1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ERNEST WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. JOHN CHIANG, STATE CONTROLLER, JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD, CHIEF DIVISION OF AUDITS, MATTHEW MIRANDA, FIELD AUDITOR, AND DOES 1­XX, Defendants. / ORDER RE BRIEFING FOR MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING No. C 08-03134 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, acting pro se, filed this action claiming civil rights and employment-law violations. Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's first amended complaint, and a hearing on the motion was scheduled for January 15, 2008. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff was required to file the opposition brief, if he wished to file one, by December 29, 2008 (given the holiday). Plaintiff, however, has filed no opposition. Plaintiff must file the opposition brief, if he intends to file one, no later than Friday, JANUARY 9, 2008. If plaintiff fails to respond to defendant's motion by that date, the motion may be granted as unopposed. Defendant must file its reply to plaintiff's opposition by Thursday, JANUARY 15, 2008. The January 15 hearing is hereby RESCHEDULED for Thursday, JANUARY 22, 2008, AT 8:00 A.M. Dated: January 6, 2009 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?