Vectren Communications Services, Inc. v. City of Alameda

Filing 298

ORDER granting 1-day extension of Reply Deadline. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 11/21/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2013)

LAW OFFICES

\,Vur-nsl¡nrRe lìnnsn

d¿

Cor-r¡rc

PFOFESSIONAL CORPORATION
KAISEF CENTEF
3OO LAKESIDE DRIVE, 24TH FLOOR

OAKLAND, CALIFOFN IA 9461 2-3524

(sl

O)

4s1 -21 70

UNIT
ED

November 18,2013

O ORD
IT IS S

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

ston
usan Ill

A

H

ER

ERED

LI

RT

Re:

NO

The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Court
450 Golden Gate Avenue
Couúroom 10, 19th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

Judge S

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

Vecfren v. City of Alameda (08-3137): Reply Deadline

Dear Judge Illston,
Replies in support of Alameda's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and in support of
Vectren's Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion in Limine are currently due this Friday,
November 22,with a hearing date of December 10. My paftner and co-counsel Greg Aker is out
of the country until the end of the week and would appreciate the opportunity to review
Alameda's reply before it is filed. 'We therefore respectfully request that the Court extend both
pafiies' reply deadline one business day, until Monday, November 25. Ihave conferred with
counsel for Vectren, who joins in this request.

As always, we appreciate the Court's attention and welcome any questions the Court may
have

Respectfully Submitted,
WULFSBERG REESE & COLVIG
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

f,*>-Z

€*^

RICHARD E. ELDER

I

883-0 l 0\242s437. I

1BB3-O1O

RT
U
O

S

ww.wulfslaw.com

S DISTRICT
TE
C
FILE NUMBEFì
TA

R NIA

FACSTMTLE

relder@wulfslaw com

FO

TÊLEPHONE (51 0) 835-91 00
RICHABD E. ELDER