Johnson v. Endow et al

Filing 40

ORDER Granting re 38 Stipulation Re Filing Second Amended Complaint filed by Charles Johnson. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/27/08. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Wayne Johnson, SBN: 112588 Attorney At Law P.O. Box 19157 Oakland, CA 94619 (510) 451-1166 Attorney for Plaintiff, Charles Johnson UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF CIVIL NO: C 08-03140 JCS STIPULATION AND ORDER RE FILING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT v. OAKLAND POLICE OFFICERS R. ENDOW, K. STAGGS, L. AUSMUS, S. SEDER, T. MORK, R. ROSIN, R. VASS, C. COX, R. JENSEN, AND OAKLAND POLICE OFFICERS WHOSE NAMES ARE NOT KNOWN TO PLAINTIFFS AT THIS TIME, INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF OAKLAND, THE CITY OF OAKLAND, AND DOES 1-10, DEFENDANT. ______________________________________________________/ It is hereby stipulated by the parties that plaintiff, Charles Johnson, may file the accompanying Second Amended Complaint in accordance with the court's Civil Minute Order of September 18, 2008. It is so stipulated. \\\ STIPULATION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT RE MINUTE ORDER -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 10/27/2008___________ ________________S/___________________ Wayne Johnson Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: 10/27/2008___________ ________________S/___________________ CHARLES E. VOSE SR. CITY ATTORNEY Attorney for Defendants UNIT ED IT IS SO ORDERED. October 27, 2008 Dated: _____________________ S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N D IS T IC T R OF STIPULATION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT RE MINUTE ORDER A C LI -2 FO ____________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO . Spero UNITEDuSTATESh C Josep MAGISTRATE JUDGE J dge R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?