Sonoma County Law Enforcement Association et al v. County of Sonoma et al

Filing 32

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR JUDGEMENT ON THE PLEADINGS re 31 Stipulation filed by Sonoma County Sheriff's Department, Bill Cogbill, County of Sonoma. Signed by Judge James Larson on 2/19/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2009)

Case 3:08-cv-03194-JL

Document 31

Filed 02/13/2009

Page 1 of 2

1 STEVEN M. WOODSIDE #58684 County Counsel 2 ANNE L. KECK #136315 Deputy County Counsel 3 County of Sonoma 575 Administration Drive, Room 105 4 Santa Rosa, California 95403-2815 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants the County of Sonoma, Sonoma County 7 Sheriff's Department, and Sheriff-Coroner William Cogbill 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. CV 08-3194-JL

11 SONOMA COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION; ED 12 CLITES; SHAUN DU FOSSEE; GRANT JOHNSON; DOMINIC TAURIAN; and 13 JIM WRIGHT, 14 15 v. 16 COUNTY OF SONOMA; SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; 17 BILL COGBILL, Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities; and DOES 1 18 through 20, inclusive, 19 20 Defendant. / Plaintiffs,

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; (PROPOSED) ORDER

21 TO THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES LARSON: 22 Defendants the County of Sonoma, the Sonoma County Sheriff's Department, and 23 Sonoma County Sheriff-Coroner William Cogbill (hereinafter collectively "Defendants") 24 respectfully request an extension of time in which to file their motion for judgment on the 25 pleadings, currently due by February 18, 2009, to and including March 4, 2009. Counsel for 26 Plaintiffs have agreed and stipulated to this request, which is made on the following grounds. 27 1. At the Case Management Conference held in this matter on January 14, 2009, 28 counsel for Defendants stated that it was Defendants' intent to file a motion for judgment on

1
Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; (Proposed) Order, USDC Case No. CV 08-3194-JL

Case 3:08-cv-03194-JL

Document 31

Filed 02/13/2009

Page 2 of 2

1 the pleadings in this matter by February 18, 2009. Accordingly, the Court entered a minute 2 order setting February 18, 2009, as the date by which such motion must be filed. 3 2. After the Case Management Conference in this matter, unanticipated events

4 and court orders to file papers in other cases have intervened, which have provided 5 Defendants' counsel with insufficient time in which to prepare the motion for judgment on 6 the pleadings to file it by the current court-ordered date. 7 3. Defendants' counsel consulted with and obtained the consent of Plaintiffs'

8 counsel to an extension of time in which to file the motion for judgment on the pleadings to 9 and including March 4, 2009. 10 4. Accordingly, Defendants request that the Court extend the time in which they

11 must file a motion for judgment on the pleadings herein to and including March 4, 2009. 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
STEVEN M. WOODSIDE, COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF SONOMA

13 Dated: February 13, 2009 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: February 13, 2009 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2/19/09 26 Dated: __________

By: ____/S/ Anne L. Keck______________________ ANNE L. KECK Attorneys for Defendants MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK, MILLER, JOHNSEN & UHRHAMMER By: __/S/ Daniel T. McNamara___________________ DANIEL T. MCNAMARA Attorneys for Plaintiffs

*

* ORDER

*

27 28

_______________________________ HON. JAMES LARSON MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; (Proposed) Order, USDC Case No. CV 08-3194-JL