Geiche v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 51

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James Larson on 11/17/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

ANATOLE A. GEICHE, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/

No. C 08-3233 JL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This Court, by its order filed July 2, 2009 at Docket # 49, granted with leave to amend Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action for municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and Monell against the City, the sole remaining claim. The Court ruled that "Plaintiff shall in his amended complaint state the particular practice or policy of the City which he alleges caused his specific injury." However, the Court did not give Plaintiff a deadline for filing his amended complaint. The Court on August 31 issued a new order to Plaintiff to file his amended complaint within 30 days of the date of that order, or this cause of action would be dismissed with prejudice, and his case closed. The Court re-sent a copy of the order on October 13, 2009. There was no response from Plaintiff.

C-08-3233 DISMISSAL

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice. Parties shall bear their own fees and costs. The clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 17, 2009

__________________________________ James Larson U.S. Magistrate Judge

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

G:\JLALL\CHAMBERS\CASES\CIVIL\08-3233\DISMISSAL.wpd

C-08-3233 DISMISSAL

Page 2 of 2