Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation
Filing
238
STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF CLAIMS by Apple Inc.. (Gilliland, James) (Filed on 12/1/2009)
Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation
Doc. 238
Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document238
Filed12/01/09 Page1 of 4
1 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP
JAMES G. GILLILAND, JR. (State Bar NO.1 07988) 2 MEHRNAZ BOROUMAND SMITH (State Bar No. 197271) MEGAN M. CHUNG (State Bar No. 232044)
3 1. JEB B. OBLAK (State Bar No. 241384)
Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor
4 San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 576-0200
5 Facsimile: (415) 576-0300
Email: jggililandętownsend.com
6 mboroumandętownsend.com
mmchungętownsend.com
7 jboblakętownsend.com
8 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
GEORGE RILEY (State Bar No. 118304) 9 Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111
10 Telephone: (415) 984-8700
Facsimile: (415) 984-8701
11 Email: grileYęomm.com
12 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant APPLE INC.
13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
i7
18 APPLE INC.,
20 v.
22
23
19 Plaintiff,
Defendant.
Case No. 08-3251 WHA
STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF CLAIMS
21 PSYSTAR CORPORATION, a Florida corporation,
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
. 24
25 Whereas on November 13,2009, the Court issued its Order Re Cross Motions for
26 Summary Judgment;
27 Whereas the Court wil hear and determine the request of plaintiff, Apple Inc. ("Apple"),
28 for a permanent injunction on December 14, 2009; and
STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF CLAIMS
-1-
townsend. CASE NO. 08-3251 WHA
Dockets.Justia.com
Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document238
Filed12/01/09 Page2 of 4
Whereas the parties desire to have a final judgment entered in this matter once a decision is
2
3
rendered by the Court regarding a permanent injunction;
Now, therefore, it is hereby stipulated by and between Apple and Psystar Corporation
("Psystar"), as follows:
4
5
1.
With respect to Apple's First Claim for Relief (Copyright Infringement) in the
6 7
8
Amended Complaint, judgment may be awarded in favor Qf Apple and against Psystar.
2.
With respect to Apple's Second Claim for Relief (Contributory and Induced
Copyright Infringement) in the Amended Complaint, judgment may be awarded in fŕvor of Apple
and against Psystar.
"
.) .
With respect to Apple's Third Claim for Relief (Violation of
9
10
11
the Digital
Milennium Copyright Act) in the Amended Complaint, judgment may be awarded in ü:ivor of
Apple and against Psystar.
4.
Amended Complaint
12
13
With respect to Apple's Fourth Claim tor Relief (Breach of Contract) in the
14
15
judgment may be entered in favor of Apple and against Psystar.
5. With respect to Apple's Fifth Claim tor Relief (Inducing Breach of Contract) in the
16 17
Amended Complaint judgment may be entered in favor of Apple and against Psystar.
6. With respect to Apple's First through Fifth Claims for Relief in the Amended
18
Complaint, damages may be awarded in favor of Apple, and against Psystar, in the amount of
$1,337,550.
7. With respect to Apple's First, Second and Third Claims for Relief
19
20
21
in the Amended
Complaint, attorneys' fees and costs in addition to and separate from the damages set forth in
22
23
paragraph 6, above, may be awarded in favor of Apple, and against Psystar, in the amount of
$1,337,500.
8. Apple agrees it will not seek to execute on the money judgments set forth in
24
25
paragraphs 6 and 7, supra, until any and all appeals in this matter are concluded or the time for
fiing any such appeal has lapsed.
26 27
9. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a), Apple wil dismiss without prejudice to its right
28
STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF CLAIMS
- 2-
townsend. CASE NO. 08-3251 WHA
Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document238
Filed12/01/09 Page3 of 4
1
to refie in the future the Sixth Claim tor Relief (Trademark Infringement), Seventh Claim for
Relief (Trademark Infringement), Eighth Claim tor Relief (Trade Dress Infringement), Ninth
Claim for Relief (Trademark Dilution), Tenth Claim for Relief (State Unfair Competition) and
Eleventh Claim for Relief (Common Law Unfair Competition) in the Amended Complaint.
Psystar agrees to toll the statute of limitations applicable to each of these claims for relief
2
3
4
5
until a
6
7
date thirty days after Apple is required to file an Answer in the matter Psysiar Coiporation v.
Apple, Inc., whether that case proceeds in the Southern District of
Florida, the Northern District of
8
California, or some other district.
10. Judgment may be entered in favor of Apple, and against Psystar, on Psystar's First
Amended Counterclaim (Declaration of Un
9 10
11
enforceability for Copyright Misuse (EULA)) and on
Un
Psystar's Second Amended Counterclaim (Declaration of
enforceability for Copyright Misuse
12
(DMCA)).
13
11.
14
15
With respect to all issues (including but not limited to liability) other than the
stipulated damages and attorneys' fees and costs awards, the parties reserve their fights to appeal with respect to the final judgments entered on Apple's First through Fifth Claims for Relief in the
16
17
Amended Complaint as well as Psystar's First and Second Amended Counterclaims.
II
18
II
19
II
20
II
21
II
22
II
23
II
24
II II
II
-)
') ~
26 27
II
28
STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF CLAIMS
-3-
townsend. CASE NO. 08-3251 WHA
Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document238
Filed12/01/09 Page4 of 4
12. The parties agree that neither the fact of this Stipulation, nor the terms of it, shall be
2
argued by either of
them either in favor of, or against, any contention that venue in the Southern
3
District of Florida is appropriate, or is not appropriate, in the matter Psystar COlporation v. Apple
Inc., S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-22535 CIV -Hoeveler/Gardner.
4
5
6
IT is SO AGREED.
7
8
DATED: November 30, 2009
9 10
1i
TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP
By~4=
APPLE INC.
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
DATED: November 30, 2009
14
15
CAMARA & SIBLEY
16
B~
..
K.A.D. CAMARA
17
18
62325485 vI
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant PSYSTAR CORPORATION
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 27
28
STIPULA nON REGARD.NG D.SPOSITION OF CLAIMS
- 4-
townsend. CASE NO. 08.3251 WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?