Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation

Filing 80

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 7/24/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2009)

Download PDF
Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation Doc. 80 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document80 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document79 Filed07/24/09 6 Filed07/23/09 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP JAMES G. GILLILAND, JR. (State Bar No. 107988) MEHRNAZ BOROUMAND SMITH (State Bar No. 197271) MEGAN M. CHUNG (State Bar No. 232044) J. JEB B. OBLAK (State Bar No. 241384) Two Embarcadero Center Eighth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 576-0200 Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 Email: jggilliland@townsend.com mboroumand@townsend.com mmchung@townsend.com jboblak@townsend.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant APPLE INC. K.A.D. CAMARA (TX Bar No. 24062646) Admitted Pro Hac Vice CAMARA & SIBLEY LLP 2339 University Boulevard Houston, TX 77005 Telephone: (713) 893-7973 Facsimile: (713) 583-1131 Email: camara@camarasibley.com DAVID WELKER (SBN 252658) WELKER & ROSARIO 2689 Sycamore Lane, Suite A6 Davis, California 95616-2800 Telephone: (949) 378-2900 Email: david.welker@post.harvard.edu Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant PSYSTAR CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. PSYSTAR CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. CV 08-03251 WHA (BZ) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 27 28 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV 08-03251 WHA (BZ) Dockets.Justia.com Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document80 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document79 Filed07/24/09 6 Filed07/23/09 Page2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Apple Inc. and Defendant and Counterclaimant Psystar Corporation, hereby request a continuance of the settlement conference until after the August 21, 2009 close of fact discovery deadline. As set forth in the Court's July 10, 2009 Order Scheduling Settlement Conference (Dkt. No. 75), the settlement conference is currently set for July 30, 2009. With the close of fact discovery and the deadline for opening expert reports scheduled for August 21, 2009, the parties are busily conducting depositions, reviewing and producing documents and otherwise working to complete their discovery. Moreover, Psystar's counsel, Kiwi Camara and David Welker, just substituted into the case on July 17, 2009. They are working expeditiously to familiarize themselves with the facts and issues in the case and have requested a later settlement conference. Apple does not object to this request. Thus, the parties respectfully request that the settlement conference be rescheduled for the earliest date on which the Court and the parties are available after August 21, 2009. Both parties and their counsel are available on September 4, 10, 11, 24 and 25, 2009 and propose those dates as alternatives to the currently scheduled July 30, 2009 date. This request for extension is the first such request and is well before the January 11, 2010 trial date. There are no other deadlines that will be impacted by the continuance. Hence, the continuance should not have any effect on the schedule for this case. IT IS, THEREFORE, STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned counsel and subject to approval of the Court, that the date of the settlement conference be extended until after the close of fact discovery in this case. DATED: July 23, 2009 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP By: /s/ James G. Gilliland, Jr. James G. Gilliland, Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant APPLE INC. STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV 08-03251 WHA (BZ) Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document80 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document79 Filed07/24/09 6 Filed07/23/09 Page3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DATED: July 23, 2009 CAMARA & SIBLEY LLP By: /s/ K.A.D. Camara K.A.D. Camara Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant PSYSTAR CORP. Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties, and good cause having been shown, the Court HEREBY GRANTS a continuance of the settlement conference, which shall now take place Oct. 6 on _________, 2009., at 9:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7/24/2009 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV 08-03251 WHA (BZ) Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document80 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document79 Filed07/24/09 6 Filed07/23/09 Page4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 62133991 v1 GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION I, Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that K.A.D. Camara has concurred in this filing. /s/ Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith MEHRNAZ BOROUMAND SMITH 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV 08-03251 WHA (BZ) -4- CAND-ECF Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document80 Filed07/24/09 Page5 of 6 Other Documents 3:08-cv-03251-WHA Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation ADRMOP, E-Filing, PRVADR, REFSET-BZ U.S. District Court Northern District of California Notice of Electronic Filing or Other Case Activity NOTE: Please read this entire notice before calling the Help Desk. If you have questions, please email the Help Desk by replying to this message; include your question or comment along with the original text. Please note that these Notices are sent for all cases in the system when any case activity occurs, regardless of whether the case is designated for e-filing or not, or whether the activity is the filing of an electronic document or not. If there are two hyperlinks below, the first will lead to the docket and the second will lead to an e-filed document. If there is no second hyperlink, there is no electronic document available . See the FAQ posting 'I have a Notice of Electronic Filing that was e-mailed to me but there's no hyperlink...' on the ECF home page at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov for more information. The following transaction was received from by Boroumand Smith, Mehrnaz entered on 7/23/2009 4:22 PM and filed on 7/23/2009 Case Name: Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation Case Number: 3:08-cv-03251-WHA Filer: Apple Inc. Document Number: 79 Docket Text: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Boroumand Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 7/23/2009) 3:08-cv-03251-WHA Notice has been electronically mailed to: David Vernon Welker James G. Gilliland Jeb Bacon Oblak K.A.D. Camara Megan M Chung david.welker@werolaw.com jggilliland@townsend.com, sstreposkoufes@townsend.com jboblak@townsend.com camara@camarasibley.com mmchung@townsend.com, slwortman@townsend.com https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?65539260561684 7/23/2009 CAND-ECF Page 2 of 2 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document80 Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith Filed07/24/09 Page6 of 6 mboroumand@townsend.com, ecasillas@townsend.com 3:08-cv-03251-WHA Please see General Order 45 Section IX C.2 and D; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to: The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: Document description:Main Document Original filename:C:\Documents and Settings\exs\My Documents\Stipulation to Continue Settlement Conference and Proposed Order.pdf Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP CANDStamp_ID=977336130 [Date=7/23/2009] [FileNumber=5509092-0] [13ffb385299ee5ca748874caaf182e769be2763d359fab48f7c840a40f80b683a2e0e b8bf3746113c5e0d116952b121356f74fb161dffa034ff6211677432ece]] https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?65539260561684 7/23/2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?