Thompson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al

Filing 31

ORDER re 27 Stipulation filed by Kevin M. Thompson, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 27 Stipulation, 24 MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANT NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION D/B/A AMTRAKS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS CALIFORNIA LAW CLAIMS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORI. Responses due by 11/28/2008.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/01/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Daniel Berko - SBN 94912 819 Eddy Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415-474-3748 E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs, KEVIN THOMPSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER ) CORPORATION dba AMTRAK, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ____________________________________ ) KEVIN THOMPSON, CASE NO: 08-3280-CRB STIPULATION TO FILE ON NOVEMBER 28, 2008 PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CALIFORNIA LAW CLAIMS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ____________________________________ Date: December 19, 2008 Time: 10:00 a.m. Hon: Charles Breyer

The undersigned parties, by and through their counsel of record pursuant to Local Rule 61, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff may have an extension of time to and including November 28, 2008 in which to file his opposition to defendant's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's California Law Claims, Or, In The Alternative Motion For Partial Summary Judgment. This stipulated request is accompanied by the declaration of Daniel Berko which sets forth the reasons for the requested enlargement of time, discloses all previous time modifications in the case and describes the effect the requested time modification would have on the schedule for the case. -1STIPULATION TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CALIFORNIA LAW CLAIMS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NOVEMBER 28, 2008

Dec. 01

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

harles Judge C

R. Brey

er

R NIA

OO IT IS S

RDERE

D

RT U O

NO

RT

H