Rambus Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation
Filing
131
ORDER granting substitution (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2009)
Case3:08-cv-03343-SI Document130
Filed09/01/09 Page1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS DALLAS, TEXAS
Mike McKool, Jr. (pro hac vice) Douglas Cawley (pro hac vice) McKOOL SMITH P.C. 300 Crescent Court Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Facsimile: (214) 978-4044 Email:mmckool@mckoolsmith.com; dcawley@mckoolsmith.com Scott L. Cole (pro hac vice) Pierre J. Hubert (pro hac vice) Craig N. Tolliver (pro hac vice) McKOOL SMITH P.C. 300 W. 6th Street Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 692-8700 Facsimile: (512) 692-8744 Email: scole@mckoolsmith.com; phubert@mckoolsmith.com; ctolliver@mckoolsmith.com Attorneys for Plaintiff RAMBUS INC.
Julie S. Turner (State Bar No. 191146) Karen I. Boyd (State Bar No. 189808) TURNER BOYD LLP 2625 Middlefield Rd. #675 Palo Alto, California 94306 Telephone: (650) 494-1530 Facsimile: (650) 472-8028 Email: turner@turnerboyd.com boyd@turnerboyd.com
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
MCKOOL SMITH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION RAMBUS INC., Case No. C-08-03343 SI Plaintiff, v. NVIDIA CORPORATION, RAMBUS INC.'S NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF LOCAL COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
20 Defendant. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Rambus's Notice of Substitution of Local Counsel and [Proposed] Order Case No. C-08-03343 SI Case No. C-08-05500 SI
NVIDIA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. RAMBUS INC., Defendant.
Case No. C-08-05500 SI
Case3:08-cv-03343-SI Document130
Filed09/01/09 Page2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS DALLAS, TEXAS
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5, and to eliminate any possibility of the appearance of a potential conflict as Rambus's current local counsel Turner Boyd LLP proceeds with a planned lateral attorney hire, Rambus hereby consents to the withdrawal of Turner Boyd LLP as its local counsel, and substitutes the following attorneys as its local counsel of record in the abovecaptioned actions in place of Turner Boyd LLP: Michael F. Kelleher (State Bar No. 165493) Karen J. Petrulakis (State Bar No. 168732) FOLGER LEVIN & KAHN LLP Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-2800 Facsimile (415) 986-2827 Email: mkelleher@flk.com Email: kpetrulakis@flk.com McKool Smith PC remains as Rambus's counsel of record in these actions. All
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MCKOOL SMITH
pleadings, orders and notices should henceforth be served upon McKool Smith attorneys of record as well as the above-identified attorneys at Folger Levin & Kahn LLP. Dated: September 1, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Pierre Hubert /s/ Pierre Hubert McKool Smith PC On Behalf of Rambus Inc.
By: /s/ Julie S. Turner /s/ Julie S. Turner On Behalf of Turner Boyd LLP
By: /s/ Karen J. Petrulakis /s/ Karen J. Petrulakis Folger Levin & Kahn LLP 2
Rambus's Notice of Substitution of Local Counsel and [Proposed] Order Case No. C-08-03343 SI Case No. C-08-05500 SI
Case3:08-cv-03343-SI Document130
Filed09/01/09 Page3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 v. RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. C-08-03343 SI
NVIDIA CORPORATION, Defendant. NVIDIA CORPORATION, Case No. C-08-05500 SI
9 Plaintiff, 10 v.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS DALLAS, TEXAS
11 RAMBUS INC., 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[Proposed] Order Case No. C-08-03343 SI Case No. C-08-05500 SI
MCKOOL SMITH
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court hereby GRANTS permission for the withdrawal of Turner Boyd LLP and for the substitution of Folger Levin & Kahn LLP as local counsel for Rambus Inc. in the abovecaptioned actions. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: ___________________, 2009 The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?