Rambus Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation

Filing 299

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Illston on 2/13/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Mike McKool, Jr. (pro hac vice)
Douglas Cawley (pro hac vice)
McKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN,
A Professional Corporation
300 Crescent Court
Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Scott L. Cole (pro hac vice)
Pierre J. Hubert (pro hac vice)
Craig N. Tolliver (pro hac vice)
McKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN,
A Professional Corporation
300 W. 6th Street
Suite 1700
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail];
[e-mail];
[e-mail]

22

25
26

Attorneys for Defendant
NVIDIA CORPORATION

Attorneys for Plaintiff
RAMBUS INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
RAMBUS INC.,

23
24

Jessica S. Pers (CBN 77740)
Catherine Krow (CBN 208412)
Justin M. Lichterman (CBN 225734)
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]

J. Daniel Sharp (CSB No. 131042)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

20
21

I. Neel Chatterjee (CSB No. 173985)
Vickie L. Feeman (CSB No. 117487)
Andrew S. Ong (CSB No. 267889)
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. C-08-03343 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

NVIDIA CORPORATION,
Defendant.

27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal
Case No. C-08-03343 SI

1
2

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”) and Defendant NVIDIA Corporation
(“NVIDIA”) have settled this matter on mutually-agreeable terms.

3

WHEREAS, this Action is defined to include the claims and counterclaims in the

4

following past and present matters: Rambus Inc. v. NVIDIA Corporation, Case No. C 08-03343

5

SI, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division; NVIDIA Corporation v. Rambus Inc.,

6

Case No. C 08-05500 SI, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division; and NVIDIA

7

Corporation v. Rambus Inc., Case No. C 08-473, Middle District of North Carolina, Durham

8

Division.

9

NOW, THEREFORE, on the basis of the settlement reached, pursuant to Federal Rule of

10

Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and

11

between the parties, through their undersigned counsel of record, that:

12
13
14
15
16

1.

Rambus hereby dismisses all claims and counterclaims brought against NVIDIA

in this Action with prejudice;
2.

NVIDIA hereby dismisses all claims and counterclaims brought against Rambus

in this Action with prejudice; and
3.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

17
18

Dated: February 10, 2012

MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN
A Professional Corporation

19
/s/ Pierre J. Hubert
Pierre J. Hubert

20
21
22

Attorneys for Plaintiff
RAMBUS INC.

23

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

24
25
26
27

Dated: February 10, 2012

/s/ I. Neel Chatterjee
I. Neel Chatterjee
Attorneys for Defendant
NVIDIA CORPORATION

28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal
Case No. C-08-03343 SI

1
2

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, §X(B), I attest under penalty of
perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory.

3
4

Dated: February 10, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Pierre J. Hubert
Pierre J. Hubert

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal
Case No. C-08-03343 SI

2

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

Dated: February ___, 2012
13

4
5
6

___________________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal
Case No. C-08-03343 SI

3