Wesner et al v. County of Napa et al

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING 21 Stipulation Extending Time for Completion of ENE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on December 22, 2008. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-03377-JSW Document 21 Filed 12/22/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 +JONES & DYER A Professional Corporation 1800 J Street Sacramento, California 95811 Telephone: (916) 552-5959 Fax: (916) 442-5959 MARK A. JONES, State Bar #96494 KRISTEN K. PRESTON, State Bar #125455 EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6103 Attorneys For: Defendant County of Napa and Napa County Board of Supervisors UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED UPON by the parties and their respective counsel of record that the deadline to complete the Early Neutral Evaluation in this matter may be extended, upon court approval, for a period of 30 days, to February 10, 2009. The parties hereto request that the court issue an order, pursuant to this stipulation, that the deadline for completion of the ENE be continued from January 6, 2009 to February 6, 2009. The parties have diligently proceeded with the case and filed their Joint Case Management Conference Statement for the conference scheduled for January 16, 2009. The Early Neutral Evaluation was tentatively scheduled for January 6, 2009, within the initial cutoff date, but the Risk Manager for the County of Napa, an essential party to the ENE session, is required to attend out of county Emergency Services training during the entire week of January 5, 2009. The parties have completed their ENE statements and have served those statements on each other and on the Evaluator, Brian S. Haughton. Mr. Haughton S T I P U L A T I O N AND ORDER EXTENDING TIM E FOR ENE COM P L E T I O N DATE H : \ M A J . c a s e s \ W e s n e r v . N a p a \ P l e a d i n g s \ S t i p u l a t i o n re E N E se s s i o n . w p d DAVID D. WESNER, JANICE L. WESNER and DON WESNER, INC. COUNTY OF NAPA and NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Defendants. _________________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. CV 08 3377 JSW STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR COMPLETION OF ENE Date: January 6, 2009 Time: 9:30 a.m Location: 350 California Street, 22nd Flr. San Francisco, CA Evaluator: Brian S. Haughton -1- Case 3:08-cv-03377-JSW Document 21 Filed 12/22/2008 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 has no objection to the brief extension to complete the ENE. The parties are in the process of rescheduling the ENE, and would expect that the session will be completed by the third week in January. The parties request a 30 day extension to ensure that the ENE will be completed no later than the new date set by the court. Accordingly, the parties request that the present date to complete Early Neutral Evaluation, January 6, 2009, be extended to February 6. 2009. DATED: December 22, 2008. /s/ Frear Stephen Schmid FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID Attorneys for Plaintiffs David D. Wesner, Janice L. Wesner and Don Wesner, Inc DATE: December 22, 2008. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JONES & DYER By: /s/ Mark A. Jones MARK A. JONES KRISTEN K. PRESTON Attorneys for Defendants County of Napa and Napa County Board of Supervisors ORDER Based upon the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED that the present date for completion of the Early Neutral Evaluation, January 6, 2009, be and hereby is extended 30 days such that the last date for completion of the Early Neutral Evaluation shall be February 6, 2009. DATE: December 22, 2008 _________________________________________ HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE, Judge S T I P U L A T I O N AND ORDER EXTENDING TIM E FOR ENE COM P L E T I O N DATE H : \ M A J . c a s e s \ W e s n e r v . N a p a \ P l e a d i n g s \ S t i p u l a t i o n re E N E se s s i o n . w p d -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?