Griffiths v. Smith et al

Filing 13

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing and no later than December 23, 2008, why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In the event plaintiff files a Notice of Need for Mediation on or before December 23, 2008, this Order to Show Cause will stand discharged without further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 11, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By order filed July 14, 2008, the parties and counsel were directed to conduct a joint inspection of the premises at issue herein and to do so no later than October 22, 2008. (See Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial Of Right to Access Under Americans With Disabilities Act Title III.) Further, plaintiff was ordered to file, no later than 45 days after the joint site inspection, a Notice of Need for Mediation. (See id.) To date, plaintiff has not filed a Notice of Need for Mediation. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later than December 23, 2008, why the above-titled action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In the event plaintiff files a Notice of Need for Mediation on or before December 23, 2008, this Order to Show Cause will stand discharged without further order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 11, 2008 United States District Court v. RICHARD M. MILSNER, et al., Defendants / MICHAEL ROBERT GRIFFITHS, Plaintiff, No. C-08-3384 MMC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?