Griffiths v. Smith et al

Filing 19

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing and no later than May 15, 2009, why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In t he event plaintiff files a Notice of Need for Mediation on or before May 15, 2009, this order to show cause will stand discharged without further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 28, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By order filed December 31, 2008, plaintiff was ordered to file, no later than April 6, 2009, a Notice of Need for Mediation. To date, plaintiff has not filed a Notice of Need for Mediation. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later than May 15, 2009, why the above-titled action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In the event plaintiff files a Notice of Need for Mediation on or before May 15, 2009, this Order to Show Cause will stand discharged without further order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 28, 2008 United States District Court v. RICHARD M. MILSNER, et al., Defendants / MICHAEL ROBERT GRIFFITHS, Plaintiff, No. C-08-3384 MMC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge