Copart, Inc. v. Auto Auction Services Corp.

Filing 38

ORDER GRANTING 37 Stipulation selecting Mediation. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/29/08. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2008)

Case 3:08-cv-03393-JSW

Document 37

Filed 09/26/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Samuel R. Miller (SBN 66871) [e-mail] Robert B. Martin III (SBN 235489) [e-mail] SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff COPART, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

COPART, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, vs. AUTO AUCTION SERVICES CORP., a Maryland corporation, Defendant.

) Case No. CV 08-3393 JSW ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ) SELECTING ADR PROCESS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. CV 08-3393 JSW
SF1 1512426v.1

Case 3:08-cv-03393-JSW

Document 37

Filed 09/26/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Mediation (ADR L.R. 6). The parties agree to hold the mediation session within ninety days from the Court's ruling on defendant's pending motion to dismiss.

DATED: September 26, 2008

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: /s/ Robert B. Martin III Attorney for Copart, Inc. DATED: September 26, 2008 ALSTON & BIRD LLP

By: /s/ Valarie Williams Attorney for Auto Auction Services Corp.

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. CV 08-3393 JSW

SF1 1512426v.1

Case 3:08-cv-03393-JSW

Document 37

Filed 09/26/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 29 , 2008 IT IS SO ORDERED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation above, this matter is hereby referred to mediation. The deadline for the mediation session is ninety days from the Court's ruling on defendant's pending motion to dismiss. This order does not modify or stay any other deadlines or obligations by the parties in this litigation, including but not limited to any disclosure or discovery requirements.

____________________________________ The Honorable Jeffrey S. White UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. CV 08-3393 JSW

SF1 1512426v.1