Jenkins et al v. City of Richmond

Filing 404

ORDER RE 402 PLAINTIFFS' STATEMENT OF CLAIMED ACTS OF RETALIATION. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/26/2012. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JAMES JENKINS, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' STATEMENT OF CLAIMED ACTS OF RETALIATION CITY OF RICHMOND, 12 No. C-08-3401 EMC Defendant. ___________________________________/ (Docket No. 402) 13 14 15 The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs' Jenkins and Picketts' Statement of Claimed Acts of 16 Retaliation regarding evidence of retaliation. However, Plaintiffs' statement does not comply with 17 the Court's order directing the parties to file briefs proffering new evidence, and does not assist the 18 Court in determining whether to allow Plaintiffs' proffer. First, Plaintiffs' statement does not 19 describe the alleged instances of retaliation in any degree of detail, so that the Court could evaluate 20 Plaintiffs' allegations. Second, Plaintiffs' statement does not distinguish between old evidence, 21 which has already been addressed in the parties' depositions, and new evidence, which has emerged 22 after the parties' depositions and could require additional discovery. The focus of the Court's prior 23 order was on new evidence, yet it cannot discern from the statement what would qualify as new 24 evidence. Nor do the Plaintiffs provide any information regarding the dates of their last depositions. 25 Third, Plaintiffs offer no further information (e.g., a sworn declaration or other evidence) as to any 26 good cause for their delayed submission. 27 /// 28 /// 1 Plaintiffs Jenkins and Pickett are directed to file a brief with the above-described detail, and 2 any other information that would be helpful to the Court, no later than Wednesday, June 27, 2012, 3 at 12:00 p.m. The Court will issue an order thereafter. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: June 26, 2012 8 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?