Jenkins et al v. City of Richmond

Filing 448

ORDER RE 446 DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF PICKETT'S RULE 26 DISCLOSURES. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/9/2012. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

JAMES JENKINS, et al.,

9

Plaintiffs,
v.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S
OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF
PICKETT'S RULE 26 DISCLOSURES

CITY OF RICHMOND,

12

No. C-08-3401 EMC

Defendant.
___________________________________/

(Docket No. 446)
13
14
15

The Court is in receipt of Defendant's objections to Plaintiff Pickett's Rule 26 disclosures.

16

Docket No. 446. The Court is not inclined to allow the volume of new witnesses Plaintiff Pickett

17

has identified. Plaintiff Picket is instructed to pare down his witness list. If he is unable to do so,

18

the Court may strike his new acts of retaliation. The Court will not postpone trial.

19

The parties are directed to meet and confer to resolve this dispute. If they are unable to do

20

so, they shall file a joint letter with the Court detailing their remaining dispute(s) no later than

21

Wednesday, August 15, 2012, at 12:00 p.m. The parties are directed to alert the Court of any

22

future disputes of this nature in the form of a joint letter.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 9, 2012

25
26
27
28

_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge