Jenkins et al v. City of Richmond

Filing 578

ORDER Re Pre-March 2007 Evidence (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

JAMES JENKINS, et al.,

9

Plaintiffs,
v.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

ORDER RE PRE-MARCH 2007
EVIDENCE

CITY OF RICHMOND,

12

No. C-08-3401 EMC

Defendant.
___________________________________/

13
14
15
16

Before the Court are the parties' motions in limine. Defendants' motion in limine No. 2 and
Plaintiff's motion in limine No. 2 touches on the admissibility of pre-March 2007 evidence.

17

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a statement in which he lists all pre-March 2007

18

evidence he intends to introduce at trial. In addition, for each instance of pre-March 2007 evidence,

19

Plaintiff shall state Plaintiff's theory as to why the evidence is relevant to the seven acts of alleged

20

discrimination and retaliation involved in this case.

21

This statement shall be filed no later than end of the day on Friday, December 13, 2013.

22
23

Dated: December 12, 2013

24
25
26
27
28

_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge