Jenkins et al v. City of Richmond
Filing
579
ORDER Re Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 7 (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
JAMES JENKINS, et al.,
9
Plaintiffs,
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN
LIMINE NO. 7
CITY OF RICHMOND,
12
No. C-08-3401 EMC
Defendant.
___________________________________/
13
14
15
Before the Court are the parties' motions in limine. Defendant’s motion in limine No. 2 and
16
Plaintiff's motion in limine No. 7 touches on the admissibility of testimony by Plaintiff’s co-
17
plaintiffs in this action.
18
19
20
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a statement in which he lists the co-Plaintiff witnesses
he intends to call at trial and the specific incidents about which he anticipates eliciting testimony.
This statement shall be filed no later than end of the day on Friday, December 13, 2013.
21
22
Dated: December 12, 2013
23
24
25
26
27
28
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?