Jensen et al v. County of Sonoma

Filing 69

ORDER For Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ROSEMARY JENSEN AND RANDY JENSEN., v. Plaintiffs, No. C-08-3440 JCS ORDER FOR JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA, Defendant. ___________________________________/ Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment, which is set for hearing on April 9, 2010. The Court's Standing Order on Motions for Summary Judgment provides as follows: The parties shall file a joint statement of undisputed facts. If the parties are unable to reach complete agreement after meeting and conferring, they shall file a joint statement of the undisputed facts about which they do agree. Separate statements of undisputed facts shall not be filed and will not be considered by the Court. Civil Standing Orders for Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero, Revised 11/03/08, ¶ 17. A document entitled "Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts" signed only by counsel for Defendant has been filed, which includes Plaintiffs' objections in footnotes. This document does not comply with the Court's Standing Order. Accordingly, the parties shall file a joint statement of undisputed facts in compliance with the Court's Standing Order by Friday, April 2, 2010 at 12:00 p.m. Any party who objects to a proposed fact without a reasonable basis for doing so may be subject to sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2010 JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?