Pagemelding, Inc. v. Feeva Technology, Inc. et al

Filing 95

ORDER to Dismiss All Claims and Counterclaims with Prejudice re 93 Stipulation filed by Feeva Technology, Inc., Feeva Technology, Inc. and Feeva Technology, Inc. terminated., Motions terminated: 82 MOTION for Summary Judgment Of Noninfringement filed by Feeva Technology, Inc... Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/15/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 Richard W. Osman, State Bar No. 167993 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT The Waterfront Building 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, California 94109 Telephone: (415) 353-0999 Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 Geoffrey Staniford, SBN 184114 COURTNEY, STANIFORD & GREGORY 10001 N. De Anza Blvd., Ste. 300 Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: (408) 342-1904 Facsimile: (408) 342-1909 Attorneys for Defendant FEEVA TECHNOLOGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) FEEVA TECHNOLOGY, INC., HITWISE USA, INC., KINDSIGHT, INC., MICROSOFT ) ) CORPORATION, AND NEBUAD, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) PAGEMELDING, INC., Case No.: CV 08-3484 CRB [PROPOSED] ORDER Action Filed: July 21, 2008 Trial Date: TBD Judge: Honorable Charles R. Breyer Having read the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, all of PageMelding's claims against Feeva and all of Feeva's counterclaims against PageMelding are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each party is to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Dated: June __, 2009 15 ISTRIC ES D TC AT ______________________________________ T RT U O UNIT ED [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV-083484 CRB ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO ha Judge C rles R. B reyer R NIA Honorable Charles R. Breyer Judge of the United States District Court DERED O OR IT S Northern District of California IS NO S RT H 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?