Save Strawberry Canyon v. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory et al

Filing 11

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time for defendants to respond to complaint. Initial Case Management Conference continued to 1/5/2009 at 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/25/08. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware John Lynn Smith (SBN 154657) Rose L. Standifer (SBN 232579) REED SMITH LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2400 Oakland, CA 94612-3572 Telephone: 510.763.2000 Facsimile: 510.273.8832 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2084 Oakland, CA 94604-2084 Attorneys for University of California Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAVE STRAWBERRY CANYON, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, vs. LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY, a federal national laboratory; STEVEN CHU, in his official capacity; DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, a federal agency; SAMUEL W. BODMAN, in his official capacity; BENJAMIN ALLEN, in his official capacity; RICHARD C. BLUM, in his official capacity; WILLIAM DE LA PENA, in his official capacity; RUSSELL S. GOULD, in his official capacity; JUDITH L. HOPKINSON, in her official capacity; JOHN HOTCHKIS, in his official capacity; EDDIE ISLAND, in his official capacity; ODESSA P. JOHNSON, in her official capacity; JOANNE CORDAY KOZBERG, in her official capacity; SHERRY L. LANSING, in her official capacity; MONICA C. LOZANO, in her official capacity; GEORGE M. MARCUS, in his official capacity; NORMAN J. PATTIZ, in his official capacity; BONNIE RIESS, in her official capacity; FREDERICK RUIZ, in his official capacity; LESLIE TANG SCHILLING, in her official capacity; BRUCE D. VARNER, in his official capacity; PAUL D. WACHTER, in his official capacity; ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity; MARK G. YUDOF, in his official capacity; JOHN GARAMENDI, in his official capacity; FABIAN NUNEZ, in his official capacity; JACK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity; ELEANOR V. BREWER, in her official capacity; PHILIP J. BUGAY, in his official capacity, Defendants. Case No.: C08-03494 TEH [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Compl. Filed: July 21, 2008 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REED SMITH LLP Honorable Thelton E. Henderson US_ACTIVE-100169789.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for good cause appearing therefor, that the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint is extended to December 1, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the CASE SCHEDULE for this action be reset as follows: 12/8/2008 Last day to: Meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan File ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel (form available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) File either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (form available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1/5/2009 12/22/2008 REED SMITH LLP Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement per Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case Management Statement (available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (CMC) in Courtroom 12, 19th Fl, SF at 1:30 PM S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED S The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson ER United States District Judge H N 2 F D IS T IC T O R [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT A C LI FO 09/25/08 Date: ______________________ erson E. Hend Thelton _______________________________ Judge R NIA NO RT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?