Li et al v. Chertoff et al

Filing 13

JUDGMENT: 1. To the extent defendants motion to dismiss or for summary judgment is based on lack of venue, the motion is hereby GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to plaintiffs refiling it in a proper venue.2. To the extent defe ndants motion to dismiss or for summary judgment seeks a ruling on the merits of plaintiffs claims, the motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice.3. Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED without prejudice. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: November 25, 2008 25 26 27 28 v. Plainitffs, WENYING LI and XU CHEN, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. CV-08-3540 MMC JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

MICHAEL CHERTOFF , et al., Defendants. /

() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. (X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. To the extent defendants' motion to dismiss or for summary judgment is based on lack of venue, the motion is hereby GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to plaintiffs' refiling it in a proper venue. 2. To the extent defendants' motion to dismiss or for summary judgment seeks a ruling on the merits of plaintiffs' claims, the motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice. 3. Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED without prejudice. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Tracy Lucero
Deputy Clerk