Culloty v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 29

ORDER granting phone appearance (be on telephone standby between 2:30 and 5 p.m.) re 26 (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-03561-SI Document 26-2 Filed 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Culloty Proposed Order CHERYL L. SCHRECK, State Bar No. 130083 cheryl.schreck@ogletreedeakins.com BRANDYN E. STEDFIELD, State Bar No. 225357 brandyn.stedfield@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 633 West Fifth Street, 53rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 239-9800 Facsimile: (213) 239-9045 Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHELLEY CULLOTY, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. C08-03561 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. C08-03561 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case 3:08-cv-03561-SI Document 26-2 Filed 03/25/2009 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Culloty Proposed Order GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, In accordance with Local Rule 16-10(a) Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company ("UP" or "Defendant") is granted its request to appear telephonically at the Further Case Management Conference on April 3, 2009, at 2:30 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: By: Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court, Northern District of California 1 CASE NO. C08-03561 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?