Culloty v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 8

ORDER granting request to extend deadline to respond. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/10/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-03561-SI Document 7-2 Filed 09/09/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6636351_1 LINDA CLAXTON, State Bar No. 125729 linda.claxton@ogletreedeakins.com BRANDYN E. STEDFIELD, State Bar No. 225357 brandyn.stedfield@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 633 West Fifth Street, 53rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 239-9800 Facsimile: (213) 239-9045 Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHELLEY CULLOTY, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. C08-03561 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING CASE NO. C08-03561 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING Case 3:08-cv-03561-SI Document 7-2 Filed 09/09/2008 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6636351_1 The Court, having considered the concurrently filed "Stipulation to Extend the Deadline to File a Responsive Pleading" hereby orders as follows: GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, Defendant shall have a ten-day extension, to September 19, 2008, to file an answer to Plaintiff's first amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. 9/10/08 DATED: By: WM. ALSUP for Honorable Susan Illston Judge, United States District Court, Central District of California Respectfully submitted, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. By: /s/ Brandyn E. Stedfield Brandyn E. Stedfield UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 1 CASE NO. C08-03561 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?