Ray et al v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 64

CLERK'S JUDGMENT: 1. The Citys motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED with respect to plaintiffs federal claims.2. Plaintiffs state law claims are hereby REMANDED to the California Superior Court in and for the County of Alameda. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Deputy Clerk Dated: October 19, 2009 v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD RAY, et al., Plaintiffs,

No. CV-08-3627 MMC JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. (X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. The City's motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's federal claims. 2. Plaintiffs' state law claims are hereby REMANDED to the California Superior Court in and for the County of Alameda.

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Tracy Lucero