Ray et al v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 75

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 73 PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR APPEAL AND ALTERNATIVE APPLICATION FOR DETERMINATION OF NON-APPEALABILITY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 19, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is plaintiffs' "Ex Parte Application to Extend Time for Appeal and Alternative That Appeal is Premature," filed November 17, 2009, by which plaintiff seeks, in the first instance, an extension of time to January 15, 2010 for the purpose of filing a notice of appeal from the Court's October 19, 2009 Judgment in the above-titled action. Good cause appearing, the motion is hereby GRANTED to the extent the Application seeks an extension; the time by which plaintiff may file a notice of appeal from the above-referenced judgment is hereby EXTENDED to December 18, 2009. See Fed. R. App. Pro. 4(a)(5)(C) (limiting length of extension to the later of "30 days after the prescribed time [set forth in Rule 4(a)] or 10 days after the date when the order granting the motion is entered"). /// United States District Court RICHARD RAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants. / No. C 08-3627 MMC ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR APPEAL AND ALTERNATIVE APPLICATION FOR DETERMINATION OF NON-APPEALABILITY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

In all other respects the Application is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

2